“If you look at the difference between what makes a partner and what makes a supplier, a good partner will always have ‘skin in the game’ and have bought into a wider technical object target. The scale of the technology problems we are trying to circumvent with cloud are bigger than any one company, even an engineering giant like IBM,” says Nigel Beighton, international VP of technology at Rackspace. This is because, fundamentally, the total cloud proposition is really quite complex. “Cloud has been a catalyst for this kind of ‘crossover’ behaviour from the start. So does this mean we need to think differently about the way cloud implementations are developed in some way? Does this changing relationship mean a different approach for CIOs? OpenStack vendors are working with their own customers on software development as they fully engage in the ‘collaborative community model of contribution’ in the true sense of open source. Williams contended during the trial that he was only trying to mimic the "feel" of Gaye's late 1970s music and insisted he did not use elements of his idol's work.īlurred Lines, which was the biggest song of 2013, remains Thicke's biggest hit.This new slightly incestuous trend goes further. His hit Happy has helped make him a household name, as has his work as a judge on NBC's singing competition show, The Voice. Williams is a 10-time Grammy Award winner whose songs that he's either performed or produced have sold more than 100 million copies worldwide. ![]() I am thrilled for the Gaye family, and the thoughtful members of the jury, who had to listen to all of that while remaining silent."īusch said he and his team were reviewing the ruling and would discuss options for how the reduction in the verdict would be handled. "The judge who actually heard all of the evidence disagreed. "Mr Thicke and Williams, and their legal team, among others, went on a public relations campaign after the jury's verdict criticising the verdict and saying the evidence did not support the finding of copyright infringement, and did not believe the decision on liability would therefore stand," the Gaye family's attorney, Richard Busch, wrote in a statement. Howard King, an attorney for Thicke and Williams, said he was still reviewing the ruling and had no immediate comment. Jurors found that rapper TI, who received songwriting credit and a share of the royalties, did not commit copyright infringement, but Kronstadt ruled on Tuesday that other elements of the jury's verdict mean he must be included in the judgment. The jury in March sided with Gaye's family, who contended Blurred Lines copied Marvin Gaye's 1977 hit Got to Give It Up. The judge rejected that motion, and also refused to issue an injunction requested by Gaye's family that would have temporarily blocked sales and performance of Blurred Lines. Kronstadt's 56-page ruling dealt with several post-trial issues, including a request by Thicke and Williams' lawyers for a new trial. ![]() The judge's ruling, however, gives Gaye's family 50% of the song's future royalties. ![]() US District Judge John A Kronstadt ruled that the copyright infringement verdict a jury reached in March should be cut from nearly $7.4m to $5.3m. Los Angeles - A judge on Tuesday trimmed more than $2m from a verdict against Robin Thicke and Pharrell Williams over their hit Blurred Lines, but Marvin Gaye's family will also get a significant share of future earnings from the 2013 hit song.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |